social.stefan-muenz.de

Search

Items tagged with: advocacy

Feet to the Fire: The next four years of US politics --- Achieving Change


A few days back, @Phil Landmeier (ᚠ) makes a strong case for political letter writing in the US by the newly remandated Left to both repair the damage of the past four years and make progress in accomplishing social change and facing future threats. He advocates letter-writing, to representatives nationally and locally.

That's a useful but incomplete step, and the idea that tens of millions of highly persuasive notes can swing policy alone is ... probably innacurrate.

A 2018 piece turned up in my feeds this morning, by Cory Doctorow on the hazards of Big Tech and AdTech, the power of targeting and impotence of persuasion:
The problem is that we’re confusing automated persuasion with automated targeting. Laughable lies about Brexit, Mexican rapists, and creeping Sharia law didn’t convince otherwise sensible people that up was down and the sky was green.

Rather, the sophisticated targeting systems available through Facebook, Google, Twitter, and other Big Tech ad platforms made it easy to find the racist, xenophobic, fearful, angry people who wanted to believe that foreigners were destroying their country while being bankrolled by George Soros.

Remember that elections are generally knife-edge affairs, even for politicians who’ve held their seats for decades with slim margins: 60% of the vote is an excellent win. Remember, too, that the winner in most races is “none of the above,” with huge numbers of voters sitting out the election. If even a small number of these non-voters can be motivated to show up at the polls, safe seats can be made contestable. In a tight race, having a cheap way to reach all the latent Klansmen in a district and quietly inform them that Donald J. Trump is their man is a game-changer.
https://locusmag.com/2018/07/cory-doctorow-zucks-empire-of-oily-rags/

(Emphasis added.)

That via PC Meyers, who adds his own observations:
I’m thinking about all those times I agreed to debates with creationists, and I’d show up at the venue to see church buses lined up outside and a crowd of people clutching Bibles filling the seats. There was no hope that I’d convince them (OK, maybe I deluded myself that I’d win over a few), and really, my role was to play the heel at a fixed match, to draw in the congregation to listen to the face, who got all the adulation. ...

The creationists were smarter than I was. They knew these events weren’t intended to inform or educate; the debate was all about rallying a crowd, drawing in more true believers who wanted to see that university egghead taught a lesson — and it didn’t matter that I wasn’t crushed, because they’d gather together all the conservative Christians and they’d find each other. It’s both sides, too. Debates at atheist events are also a sham, primarily about grooming a particular audience rather than teaching anything new.

Doctorow is focused on politics and the media, but it’s the same old story. The goal isn’t to persuade, it’s to align people with a gang.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2020/11/28/cory-doctorow-1/

So you've got to ask, what are the goals of letter-writing to political representatives?

Very, very, very rarely, it's to persuade.

Most often, it's to signal which way the wind blows.

Politicians live and die on a very few things:
  • Votes.
  • Money (mostly to buy votes).
  • Exposure: airtime, audience, column-inches, likes and shares, Q-score. Again, to buy votes.
  • Their career --- in politics or out, the next move.
  • Relationships. With constituents, donors, politicians, interest groups. Translating to the above.
  • "Values" are almost entirely flags politicians raise to signal, scare, or align their voters. Not personal convictions.
Letters signal voter intent (which way the wind blows), numbers (votes), and intensity (how strong and organised). You want to be a hurricane.

Letters to politicians, mostly, don't persuade. That's the role for position papers, political books, letters to the editor, op-ed pieces, Vox Pop 'listener viewpoints' on radio and television, blog posts, internal communications within activist groups, and overly-long Diaspora comments.

A think piece as an official position paper by a lobbying group can employ persuasive argument. Voters, mostly, need to make clear which of those papers matter, and which groups' interests they represent.

Corporations are made of money, and a surprisingly small amount goes a long way in politics --- the ROI on lobbying is said to be astonishingly high. If you don't need extensive fundraising (you've already got the cash on hand) and receive the benefits directly, most especially. Hence the focus on appropriations and taxation.

The public ... mostly isn't. Fundraising is extraordinarily expensive (80--90% of money raised often goes to raising money), and is better though of as outreach (by the organisation) and intent signalling (by the donors). But the public has votes, and in an online world can help with exposure.

If you can mobilise and deliver those votes you've got something. Mostly in marginal districts and states. If a few hundred votes will turn a seat, and a few seats a state legislature or delegation, that's power. Retiring politicians (look to older members of Senate, House, or statehouses). Letters and the organisation behind them is what signals most convincingly. Exposure is useful. Money is gravy --- a nice addition, but not the main dish. Though yes, individual letters, postcards, faxes, and emails are dutifully tallied. Pollsters are also on retainer though and tend to offer clearer insight.

The online epistemic battle is an interesting one. Submissions to discussions, early up-and-down votes, and enough kittens, titties, and pratfalls to keep people coming back, can make a surprising difference, though you're fighting with the algorithm. Zuckerberg owns the microphone, and he knows it.

The average person has an IQ of 100, and half are lower than that. I love me some rational debate, but its effectiveness is tremendously overrated. You may want to persuad core leaders within your group, but both internal and external communications should be short and sweet.

Internally, to your group, principally emotive.

Externally to representative, indicating issue, direction (support/oppose), and organisation (groups you allign with).

A letter is a signal. What's important is what it signifies.

And that's where I think you want to focus.

(Further thoughts on other aspects of politicking to follow.)

#politics #FeetToTheFire #advocacy #uspol
 


Commons

Reclaiming What Is Ours


The Commons is a documentary film about communities re-asserting sustainable futures using consensus, equity and shared resources – ancient Commons principles. The film shares the increasing privatization and destruction of commons, primarily in the United States, and shows how many activists are re-taking commons, re-establishing communities controlling heir own commons: maker spaces, land trusts, cooperatives, local food production and distribution, shared housing, free education, community centers – all as Commoners stewarding what they share.

During the making of the film, we found a re-awakening in progress. Tired of waiting for government, many Commoners are taking action to push back the tide of un-just privatization or the destruction of shared resources. People are working democratically, money is being re-imagined, new schools starting, co-operatives launching. Many – most – with the new idea of ‘Open Source’ deeply embedded in their planning. People are asking for sustainability, not destruction, sharing not privatization, and justice – not brutality.

We made this film because people needed to know that action was already underway, and much more was possible, to reclaim sovereignty over their Commons: the shared spaces and places, the wealth of the land, oceans and atmosphere, the internet and the ideas that are the heritage of life itself. People needed to know that it is both possible and successful to have a new kind of ‘Commons’ democracy, a self-governance based on consensus, justice, sharing, sustainability and goodwill.

We found there are already laws protecting the rights of Commoners. Many of these laws are the underpinning of our legal system itself…

But something deeper is happening

Everyone is restless – especially young people. Something inside us is calling for a better future – and people are unwilling to settle for the bleak future many fear. They understand deeply that the shared resources of the world are a human right, owned by all, not just a few – and that these resources are in peril.

We found that commons-based inspiration flows through people, especially young people, telling them not to settle for less than what they know is possible: to make that incredible future they see just ahead of humanity: vitality, goodwill, sharing – what Dr. Andreas Weber describes as ‘Enlivenment’

In many forms, people can see that vision of an amazing future for humanity – surrounded by the life of the planet.

Nine years in the making, we listened as 49 communities in the #Americas, #Europe, #Africa and south #Asia told us what has made their Commons work over the centuries.

#TheCommons #CommonsFilm #documentary #film #Commons #community #communities #local #food #food-growing #food-sharing #education #housing #sharing #resources #principles #shared-resources #open #coop #co-op #open-coop #opencoop #open-source #ideas #commons-based #inspiration #democracy #activism #advocacy #awakening #sovereignty #goodwill #enlivenment #sustainability #resilience #OpenCo-opCommons #KevinHansen #BunkerFilms #docu-films
 


Commons

Reclaiming What Is Ours


The Commons is a documentary film about communities re-asserting sustainable futures using consensus, equity and shared resources – ancient Commons principles. The film shares the increasing privatization and destruction of commons, primarily in the United States, and shows how many activists are re-taking commons, re-establishing communities controlling heir own commons: maker spaces, land trusts, cooperatives, local food production and distribution, shared housing, free education, community centers – all as Commoners stewarding what they share.

During the making of the film, we found a re-awakening in progress. Tired of waiting for government, many Commoners are taking action to push back the tide of un-just privatization or the destruction of shared resources. People are working democratically, money is being re-imagined, new schools starting, co-operatives launching. Many – most – with the new idea of ‘Open Source’ deeply embedded in their planning. People are asking for sustainability, not destruction, sharing not privatization, and justice – not brutality.

We made this film because people needed to know that action was already underway, and much more was possible, to reclaim sovereignty over their Commons: the shared spaces and places, the wealth of the land, oceans and atmosphere, the internet and the ideas that are the heritage of life itself. People needed to know that it is both possible and successful to have a new kind of ‘Commons’ democracy, a self-governance based on consensus, justice, sharing, sustainability and goodwill.

We found there are already laws protecting the rights of Commoners. Many of these laws are the underpinning of our legal system itself…

But something deeper is happening

Everyone is restless – especially young people. Something inside us is calling for a better future – and people are unwilling to settle for the bleak future many fear. They understand deeply that the shared resources of the world are a human right, owned by all, not just a few – and that these resources are in peril.

We found that commons-based inspiration flows through people, especially young people, telling them not to settle for less than what they know is possible: to make that incredible future they see just ahead of humanity: vitality, goodwill, sharing – what Dr. Andreas Weber describes as ‘Enlivenment’

In many forms, people can see that vision of an amazing future for humanity – surrounded by the life of the planet.

Nine years in the making, we listened as 49 communities in the #Americas, #Europe, #Africa and south #Asia told us what has made their Commons work over the centuries.

#TheCommons #CommonsFilm #documentary #film #Commons #community #communities #local #food #food-growing #food-sharing #education #housing #sharing #resources #principles #shared-resources #open #coop #co-op #open-coop #opencoop #open-source #ideas #commons-based #inspiration #democracy #activism #advocacy #awakening #sovereignty #goodwill #enlivenment #sustainability #resilience #OpenCo-opCommons #KevinHansen #BunkerFilms #docu-films
 




Fools & Dreamers: Regenerating a Native Forest


Fools & Dreamers is a 30-minute documentary telling the story of Hinewai Nature Reserve, on Canterbury’s Banks Peninsula, and its kaitiaki/manager of 30 years, botanist Hugh Wilson. We learn about the commitment of Hugh and the Maurice White Native Forest Trust to regenerate marginal, hilly farmland into native forest, using a minimal interference method that allows nature to do the work, giving life to over 1500 hectares of native forest, waterways, and the creatures that live within them.

When, in 1987, Hugh let the local community know about his plans to allow gorse to grow as a nurse canopy for self-sown native trees, the response was sceptical at best and outright angry and disparaging for the most part – one farmer stating the plan was the sort to be expected only of “fools and dreamers”. Now considered a local hero by town and country folk alike, Hugh’s home at Hinewai overlooks a valley resplendent in native forest canopy, where birds and other wildlife are abundant and 47 known waterfalls are in permanent flow.

An inspiring, charismatic personality, Hugh’s passion and enthusiasm for his life’s project come through in every sentence he speaks. A dreamer who has made his dream come true, Hugh has proven without doubt that nature knows best – and that he is no fool.

#FoolsAndDreamers #documentary #film #HughWilson #nature #forests #trees #waterways #tree-planting #stewardship #forest-building #protection #restoration #conservation #local #community #people #initiative #advocacy #HinewaiNatureReserve #Hinewai #MauriceWhiteNativeForestTrust #HappenFilms
 




Fools & Dreamers: Regenerating a Native Forest


Fools & Dreamers is a 30-minute documentary telling the story of Hinewai Nature Reserve, on Canterbury’s Banks Peninsula, and its kaitiaki/manager of 30 years, botanist Hugh Wilson. We learn about the commitment of Hugh and the Maurice White Native Forest Trust to regenerate marginal, hilly farmland into native forest, using a minimal interference method that allows nature to do the work, giving life to over 1500 hectares of native forest, waterways, and the creatures that live within them.

When, in 1987, Hugh let the local community know about his plans to allow gorse to grow as a nurse canopy for self-sown native trees, the response was sceptical at best and outright angry and disparaging for the most part – one farmer stating the plan was the sort to be expected only of “fools and dreamers”. Now considered a local hero by town and country folk alike, Hugh’s home at Hinewai overlooks a valley resplendent in native forest canopy, where birds and other wildlife are abundant and 47 known waterfalls are in permanent flow.

An inspiring, charismatic personality, Hugh’s passion and enthusiasm for his life’s project come through in every sentence he speaks. A dreamer who has made his dream come true, Hugh has proven without doubt that nature knows best – and that he is no fool.

#FoolsAndDreamers #documentary #film #HughWilson #nature #forests #trees #waterways #tree-planting #stewardship #forest-building #protection #restoration #conservation #local #community #people #initiative #advocacy #HinewaiNatureReserve #Hinewai #MauriceWhiteNativeForestTrust #HappenFilms
 




Fools & Dreamers: Regenerating a Native Forest


Fools & Dreamers is a 30-minute documentary telling the story of Hinewai Nature Reserve, on Canterbury’s Banks Peninsula, and its kaitiaki/manager of 30 years, botanist Hugh Wilson. We learn about the commitment of Hugh and the Maurice White Native Forest Trust to regenerate marginal, hilly farmland into native forest, using a minimal interference method that allows nature to do the work, giving life to over 1500 hectares of native forest, waterways, and the creatures that live within them.

When, in 1987, Hugh let the local community know about his plans to allow gorse to grow as a nurse canopy for self-sown native trees, the response was sceptical at best and outright angry and disparaging for the most part – one farmer stating the plan was the sort to be expected only of “fools and dreamers”. Now considered a local hero by town and country folk alike, Hugh’s home at Hinewai overlooks a valley resplendent in native forest canopy, where birds and other wildlife are abundant and 47 known waterfalls are in permanent flow.

An inspiring, charismatic personality, Hugh’s passion and enthusiasm for his life’s project come through in every sentence he speaks. A dreamer who has made his dream come true, Hugh has proven without doubt that nature knows best – and that he is no fool.

#FoolsAndDreamers #documentary #film #HughWilson #nature #forests #trees #waterways #tree-planting #stewardship #forest-building #protection #restoration #conservation #local #community #people #initiative #advocacy #HinewaiNatureReserve #Hinewai #MauriceWhiteNativeForestTrust #HappenFilms
 
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto

Forum Advocacy für anwaltschaftlich tätige Gruppen


Heute fand im Evangelischen Studierendenzentrum „die BRÜCKE“ das erste Forum zum Kennenlernen und Vernetzen von anwaltschaftlich tätigen Gruppen statt. Es waren etwa 60 TeilnehmerInnen gekommen. Vormittags gab es einen interessanten Vortrag von Dr. Jochen Motte, VEM, zum Thema Advocacy für Menschenrechte. Am Nachmittag wurden in 5 Workshops Themen wie Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, Mitarbeitergewinnung aber auch Frust und Scheitern bearbeitet. Ein gelungener Tag!

http://p346921.mittwaldserver.info/?c=news&s=news&file=news_detail&id=349

#miteinander #füreinander #kirche #evangelisch #sozial #advocacy #menschenrechte #politik #engagement #essen #ruhr #ruhrgebiet #kirchenkreis #vem #ehrenamt
 
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto
Bild/Foto

Forum Advocacy für anwaltschaftlich tätige Gruppen


Heute fand im Evangelischen Studierendenzentrum „die BRÜCKE“ das erste Forum zum Kennenlernen und Vernetzen von anwaltschaftlich tätigen Gruppen statt. Es waren etwa 60 TeilnehmerInnen gekommen. Vormittags gab es einen interessanten Vortrag von Dr. Jochen Motte, VEM, zum Thema Advocacy für Menschenrechte. Am Nachmittag wurden in 5 Workshops Themen wie Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, Mitarbeitergewinnung aber auch Frust und Scheitern bearbeitet. Ein gelungener Tag!

http://p346921.mittwaldserver.info/?c=news&s=news&file=news_detail&id=349

#miteinander #füreinander #kirche #evangelisch #sozial #advocacy #menschenrechte #politik #engagement #essen #ruhr #ruhrgebiet #kirchenkreis #vem #ehrenamt
 

Forum Advocacy für anwaltschaftlich tätige Gruppen


Vortrag und Workshops im Studierendenzentrum

In Essen sind zahlreiche Gruppen aktiv, die sich anwaltschaftlich für andere Menschen in schwierigen Situationen engagieren – doch längst nicht alle wissen voneinander. Aus diesem Grund empfiehlt die neue Konzeption des Kirchenkreises Essen, die Vernetzung dieser Initiativen zu fördern. Ein erster wichtiger Schritt ist das „Forum Advocacy“ am Samstag, 30. März, von 10 bis 16 Uhr im Evangelischen Studierendenzentrum „die BRÜCKE“, Universitätsstraße 19.

Anmeldung erforderlich.

http://p346921.mittwaldserver.info/?c=news&s=news&file=news_detail&id=349

#miteinander #füreinander #kirche #evangelisch #sozial #advocacy #menschenrechte #politik #engagement #essen #ruhr #ruhrgebiet #kirchenkreis
 

Forum Advocacy für anwaltschaftlich tätige Gruppen


Vortrag und Workshops im Studierendenzentrum

In Essen sind zahlreiche Gruppen aktiv, die sich anwaltschaftlich für andere Menschen in schwierigen Situationen engagieren – doch längst nicht alle wissen voneinander. Aus diesem Grund empfiehlt die neue Konzeption des Kirchenkreises Essen, die Vernetzung dieser Initiativen zu fördern. Ein erster wichtiger Schritt ist das „Forum Advocacy“ am Samstag, 30. März, von 10 bis 16 Uhr im Evangelischen Studierendenzentrum „die BRÜCKE“, Universitätsstraße 19.

Anmeldung erforderlich.

http://p346921.mittwaldserver.info/?c=news&s=news&file=news_detail&id=349

#miteinander #füreinander #kirche #evangelisch #sozial #advocacy #menschenrechte #politik #engagement #essen #ruhr #ruhrgebiet #kirchenkreis
 
Later posts Earlier posts